Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
BIZ106_Assessment_2_Brief_Mind-map and Written Response
|
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF |
|
|
Subject Code and Title |
BIZ106 Academic and Business Communication Skills |
|
Assessment Task |
Mind-map and Written Response |
|
Individual/Group |
Individual |
|
Length |
Mind-map + 750 words |
|
Learning Outcomes |
The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Apply referencing conventions to adhere to academic integrity principles.
b) Identify and evaluate applicable sources to present information for a specific purpose.
c) Interpret and synthesise a range of written texts for knowledge and meaning.
|
|
Submission |
12-week duration: Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday Module 7
(Week 7)
8-week duration: Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday Module 7
(Week 4)
6-week duration: Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday Module 7
(Week 4)
|
|
Weighting |
40% |
|
Total Marks |
100 marks |
Assessment Task
Context
In addition to the words themselves, the structure of a paragraph of writing is critical to its effectiveness in communicating your understanding of a topic.
The most effective way to communicate your understanding of a topic is by paraphrasing what you have read about the topic. This means using your own words to express the ideas/theories/concepts – in other words, the intellectual property – of others (and citing and referencing your sources).
You can paraphrase your understanding of a topic in the form of paragraphs.
Instructions
A. Mind-map (50%)
B. Written Response (50%)
PART A: Mind-map (50%)
a. The topic of the articleb. Identify three (3) main points within the articlec. Identify at least three (3) supporting reasons for each main pointd. Apply your library research skills from Assessment 1 to locate and identify one
(1) source to support each of the three main points
PART B: Written Response (50%)
• Topic sentence• Supporting sentence #1• Supporting sentence #2• Supporting sentence #3• Concluding sentence
Referencing
Submission Instructions
Submit your mind-map and paragraph via the Briefs & Submissions link link in the main navigation menu in BIZ106 Academic and Business Communication Skills.
Please follow the file naming convention detailed below:
BIZ106_ LastName_FirstNameInitial_StudentID_Mind-map.pdfBIZ106_ LastName_FirstNameInitial_StudentID_Paragraph.docx
The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback in MyLearn. Feedback can be viewed in My Marks.
Academic Integrity
Students must also keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed
Assessment Rubric
|
Assessment Attributes
PART A
|
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
|
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
|
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
|
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
|
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
|
|
Identification of key
information (Mind-map)
Total Percentage for this assessment criterion = 50% |
Demonstrates expert comprehension by
identifying all main
points and providing
robust supporting
reasons and evidence
for each point.
|
Demonstrates proficient comprehension by identifying most main points and providing a number of good supporting reasons and evidence for each point.
|
Demonstrates capable
comprehension by identifying some main points and providing some valid supporting reasons and evidence for each point.
|
Demonstrates functional comprehension by identifying at least one main point and attempting to provide a supporting reason and evidence.
|
Demonstrates lack of comprehension by failing to identify main points and supporting reasons and evidence.
|
|
Assessment Attributes
PART B
|
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
|
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
|
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
|
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
|
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
|
|
Effective written
communication (Structure) Total Percentage for this assessment criterion = 20% |
Paragraph is constructed according to the prescribed format.
Information is expertly structured and sequenced in such away that meaning is consistently easy to follow.
|
Paragraph is mostly constructed according to the prescribed format. Information is proficiently structured and sequenced in such a way that meaning is easy to follow. |
Paragraph is constructed somewhat according to the prescribed format. Information is capably structured and sequenced in such a way that meaning can be followed. |
Paragraph attempts to adhere to the prescribed format.
Information is functionally structured and sequenced in such a way that meaning is sometimes difficult to follow.
|
Paragraph does not adhere to the prescribed format. Information is disorganised and lacks structure and sequence such that meaning is obscured as a result. |
|
Effective written
communication
(Paraphrasing)
Total Percentage for this assessment criterion = 20%
|
Expertly, coherently, and precisely paraphrases information; demonstrates clear integration of mind map content into paragraphs. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a broad range of specialised language and terminology.
Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are free from errors.
|
Coherently and concisely paraphrases information; most mind-map content integrated into paragraphs.
Accurately employs a range of specialised language and terminology. Minor errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation.
|
Coherently paraphrases information; evidence of integration of some mind map content into paragraphs.
Employs some specialised language and terminology. Errors present in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation.
|
Attempts to paraphrase information; attempts to integrate some mindmap content into paragraphs.
Attempts to employ specialised language and terminology.
Several errors in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation.
|
Fails to paraphrase information.
Specialised language and terminology are rarely or inaccurately employed. Many errors in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation.
|
|
Correct citation and referencing of sources Total percentage for this
assessment criterion = 10%
|
All in-text citations and reference list entries follow current TUA APA referencing guidelines; no citation and referencing errors.
|
Nearly all in-text citations and reference list entries follow current TUA APA referencing guidelines; minor citation and referencing errors.
|
Most in-text citations and reference list entries follow current TUA APA referencing guidelines; some citation and referencing errors.
|
Some in-text citations and/or reference list entries follow current TUA APA referencing guidelines; several citations and/or referencing errors.
|
In-text citations and/or reference list entries are absent and/or do not follow current TUA APA referencing guidelines.
|