Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
Assessment 2: Lenses and Levels Report (Individual) (myBCom points for PLO6)
Plagiarism involves a person using words or ideas of others and passing them off as their own or republishing their own previously submitted work and presenting it as new findings or work without referencing the earlier work. It undermines academic and research integrity and is not tolerated at the University.
Is it very important that you respect academic integrity and avoid all forms of plagiarism. This includes buying essay/writing services from third parties, engaging another person to complete your assessment for you (regardless of if you paid them or not) or selling copies of lecture or tutorial notes to other students. The University takes academic integrity very seriously - if you have been found to breach the Student Conduct, the University may take disciplinary action under the Student Misconduct Procedure.
We may reach out to you about your writing if we have questions in the process of marking. Please keep drafts of your writing to show your thought and work process. If a large part of your report submission is from the outputs of generative AI (such as ChatGPT), it will be regarded as serious academic misconduct and subject to the standard penalties, which may include fail, suspension and exclusion. Please refer to AI Policy in this Guide.
Turnitin is an originality checking and plagiarism prevention tool that enables checking of submitted written work for improper citation or misappropriated content. Each Turnitin assignment is checked against other students' work, the Internet and key resources selected by your Course Coordinator.
If you are instructed to submit your assessment via Turnitin, you will find the link to the Turnitin submission in your Moodle course site. You can submit your assessment well before the deadline and use the Similarity Report to improve your academic writing skills before submitting your final version.
In this course, students are NOT allowed to use generative AI software for any part of the assessment. The unauthorised use of AI in assessments is a form of cheating and is student misconduct at UNSW. When unauthorised use of AI in assessments is determined, penalties may include a fail and mark of zero for the course, through to suspension or permanent exclusion.
• Prevent you from completing a course requirement,• Keep you from attending an assessment,• Stop you from submitting an assessment,• Significantly affect your assessment performance.Available here is a list of circumstances that may be beyond your control. This is only a list of examples, and your exact circumstances may not be listed.
• Gather background information on the chosen business.• Identify RECENT (within the last three years) issues/changes in the socio-cultural and political-legal environments (one issue/change per environment) that are relevant to the business.• Collect evidence, data, real-world examples, etc. to support analysis
• Identify the level of global business environments where the issues/changes exist (city, regions within state, state/province, national, regional blocs, global/the world)• Explain the importance and relevance of the issues/changes to the business as seen through the socio-cultural and political-legal lenses.• In doing so, apply the key concepts pertaining to these lenses (discussed in week 2, 3, and 4) and relate them to the issues/changes and the client’s business. Remember this assessment is about how the RECENT issues/changes are potentially impacting the business, so this should help inform your selection of relevant concepts for your report.• Use relevant evidence, data, and real-world examples, etc. from credible sources to support your analysis.• Synthesise information from various sources and perspectives to present a holistic, comprehensive understanding of the external business environment
• A summary of the entire report in a single page.• This should be written after the rest of the report has been completed.• The aim of this section is to allow a busy manager to get an overview of the entire report without needing to read the full document.
• What is the purpose of this document?• For which organisation is it developed?• What are the issues/changes identified though the lenses?• How and why they are relevant for your client’s business?
• Organise this section with subheadings in a way that best supports your analysis. You can structure it by lenses (socio-cultural and political-legal), by specific issues/changes, or using another logical method. However, it must include the analysis of issues/changes and evaluation of impacts (opportunities and threats).• The analysis supports your identification of relevant opportunities and threats and their relevance for your client’s business. Therefore, it is vital that the analysis section is more extensive and detailed than the subsequent discussions on opportunities and threats.
• Briefly summarise your report.• Highlight how each lens helps your business client to understand complex global business environments and make appropriate decisions.
• If you have additional information that is important and relevant but cannot fit within the body of your report, you may include this in an appendix.• Anything included in an appendix must be referred to in the body of the report. However, the story of the report must make sense without having to refer to an appendix.• This should not be a data dump. If you can provide a reliable link or a summary, this will add more value.
1. You must submit your report in Word format. Submitting a format other than Word might result in you receiving a penalty for Assessment 2.
1. On the Assessment Hub Tab, under the Assessment Links Section, click the assignment name:
to-1 sessions.
|
Criteria |
% |
Fail (F) <50 |
Pass (P) 50-64 |
Credit (C) 65-74 |
Distinction (D) 75-84 |
High Distinction (HD) >85 |
|
Understanding and Application of Concepts |
35 |
Little to no understanding of key concepts of the socio cultural and political-legal lenses. Application of concepts to the business scenario is incorrect or missing. |
Demonstrates basic understanding of key concepts of the socio-cultural and political-legal lenses. Application of concepts to the business scenario is limited or superficial. |
Displays sound understanding of most key concepts of the socio-cultural and political-legal lenses. Application of concepts to the business scenario is generally accurate but may lack depth. |
Shows strong understanding of key concepts of the socio-cultural and political-legal lenses with minor gaps. Applies these concepts effectively to the business scenario. |
Demonstrates comprehensive and nuanced understanding of all relevant concepts of the socio-cultural and political legal lenses. Applies these concepts with exceptional insight and originality to the business scenario. |
|
Critical Analysis and Synthesis |
35 |
Little to no analysis and synthesis of information/ perspectives. No identification of opportunities and threats. Arguments are incorrect or unsupported. |
Provides basic analysis with limited synthesis of information/ perspectives to generate simplistic implications for opportunities and threats. Arguments are somewhat supported by evidence. |
Shows adequate analysis with some synthesis of information/ perspectives from credible sources to draw reasonable implications for opportunities and threats with some evidence of evaluation. Arguments are generally well supported from credible sources. |
Demonstrates strong analysis with effective synthesis of information/ perspectives from various credible sources to generate clear and in-depth evaluation of opportunities and threats. Arguments are well supported and insightful. |
Provide exceptional analysis with comprehensive synthesis of information/ perspectives from a wide range of credible sources to generate detailed and insightful evaluation of opportunities and threats. Arguments are highly insightful and well-supported. |
|
Report Presentation |
20 |
Fails to adhere to professional formatting and presentation instructions.
Ideas are poorly organized with structure being unclear, illogical or inconsistent.
Fails to adhere to word limit guidelines. Referencing is missing or incorrect.
|
Basically adheres to professional formatting and presentation instructions.
Ideas are somewhat organized with structure being generally clear but may not consistent Adheres to word limit guidelines. Referencing is present but may have errors or inconsistencies.
|
Adequately adheres to professional formatting and presentation instructions.
Ideas are clearly organized with mostly clear and consistent structure.
Adheres to word limit guidelines.
Referencing is mostly correct with minor errors
|
Strongly adheres to professional formatting and presentation instructions.
Ideas are well-organized with clear, logical and consistent structure.
Adheres to word limit guidelines.
Referencing is correct and consistent.
|
Excellently adheres to professional formatting and presentation instructions.
Ideas are exceptionally well organized with clear, logical and consistent structure.
Adheres to word limit guidelines.
Referencing is flawless and consistent.
|
|
Written Communication |
10 |
Uses unclear, unprofessional language with frequent grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing is unclear.
Information is disorganised and lacks coherence.
|
Uses basic language with noticeable grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing lacks clarity and conciseness although sentences are clear and complete. Information is somewhat organized. |
Uses clear, professional language with few grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing is moderately clear and fairly concise. Sentences are mostly well constructed.
Information is presented with moderate logical coherence.
|
Uses strong, professional language with minimal grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing concise. is clear and Sentences are well constructed.
Information is presented in a coherent and logical manner.
|
Uses exceptional, professional language with no grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. Writing is exceptionally clear and concise. Sentences are well constructed. Information is presented in a highly logical and coherent manner. |