Obfuscation can help protect intellectual property by making it difficult for unauthorized individuals or competitors to understand and replicate the underlying algorithms or logic in the code. Such ability is crucial for software companies who want to keep their unique ideas or programs safe.

It can be used to enforce strict licensing restrictions by making it more difficult to tamper with or remove license checks within the code. By obscuring crucial components of the licensing mechanism, developers can safeguard against the unauthorized utilization or dissemination of their software.

In online multiplayer games, obfuscation techniques can be used to make it difficult for players to manipulate or cheat in the game. By obfuscating critical game logic or data, developers can make it more challenging for players to gain an unfair advantage by modifying the code.

Bidgoli (2006) [1] discusses the concept of code obfuscation, explaining that it involves the use of heuristic techniques to alter a program’s code to safeguard its privacy, as noted by Libes in 1993 [3]. This process turns the program into a complex and less intelligible version that is difficult to reverse-engineer, yet it maintains the original functionality. Further elaboration by Collberg and Thomborson in 2002 categorizes the methods of code obfuscation into lexical, control, and data transformations [2]. So, according to [1], lexical transformations are designed to alter the appearance of code to confuse potential attackers. In contrast, data transformations are focused on concealing the data structures of the program, and control transformations target the obfuscation of the program’s control flow by using opaque predicates. The area of lexical transformation in code is particularly intriguing, attracting interest in academic circles and among programming enthusiasts. This fascination is evident in competitions such as the International Obfuscated C Code Contest, which challenges participants to write intentionally obfuscated code. References such as the IOCCC and Mateas[4, 5] highlight the creative, albeit complex, approaches programmers take to creating such code. These competitions attest to the ingenuity and technical skill required to effectively obfuscate code, transforming programming into a blend of art and science. The transformation process is not simply a matter of changing variable names. It requiresa deep understanding of how to manipulate the syntax and structure of the code itself to  preserve its functionality while rendering its logic nearly indecipherable to the human eye.

There are several common approaches to code obfuscation, each with its own techniques and characteristics. Some common techniques include:

Go to the Using Metasploit/Getting Started/Nightly Installers page and install the

Table 5.1: Obfuscator variants with their comments

MSCT «PREPRINT» © 2023 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFTREFERENCES 173 

[2] C.S. Collberg and C. Thomborson.“Watermarking, tamper-proofing, and obfuscation - tools for software protection.” In: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28.8 (Aug. 2002), pp. 735–746. DOI: 10.1109/tse.2002.1027797.

[3] Don Libes. Obfuscated C and other mysteries. Wiley professional computing. New York, NY: Wiley, 1993. 413 pp. ISBN: 978-0471578055.

[4] Michael Mateas and Nick Montfort. “A box, darkly: Obfuscation, weird languages, and code aesthetics.” In: Proceedings of the 6th Digital Arts and Culture Conference, IT University of Copenhagen. Vol. 144. 2005, p. 53.

[5] The International Obfuscated C Code Contest. 2023.