Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
INTRODUCTION TO NETWORKING
Group Assignment (50%)
Intake: APD/APU1F240
Hand Out Date:Week 3
Due Date – Team Work:Week 12 - Word Count Limit: 4000
Lecturer: Shahab Alizadeh, David Tan, Joshua Samual, Nurul Haniza Mohtar
The objective of this assignment is to enable students to utilize fundamental principles of wired networks, as well as the Cisco Packet Tracer simulation tool, to design and set up a LAN and WAN topology. Furthermore, students should be capable of developing their IP addressing scheme, employing subnetting to divide their network, and configuring network devices like routers and switches.
1. Assessed Learning Outcomes:
· CLO2: Apply suitable topology, IP addressing scheme and configuration techniques in a network design based on the given scenario (C3, PLO2)
· CLO3: Present network design and configuration using simulation tool (A2, PLO5)
Note: PLO2 –Cognitive Skills. PLO5 – Communication Skills.
2. Scenario:
NeuroByte, a growing start-up with offices in Malacca, Ipoh, Kedah, and Perlis, aims to establish network connectivity across its four locations. The company has approached APU for advice and help. Based on the requirements, APU has recommended using the expertise of its students to develop a networking solution and to conduct necessary network implementation/configurations. In addition to the documentation that captures the design and implementation process, a justification for the proposed solution will help the company better understand its needs and help achieve its long-term business goals.
For the proposed network design, you are required to propose a network topology that is suitable for LAN and WAN. The topology should include adequate routers and switches that can provide connectivity to end devices and other remote networks via appropriate communication media.
To ensure optimal routing, routers and switches should be configured properly with the use of static routing. This will help to ensure that packets are always routed correctly to their intended destinations.
Your proposed network should also support Internet of Things (IoT) devices that are used to automate and monitor various aspects of your business, such as temperature, lighting, and security. These devices should be connected to the network using wired connections.
Additionally, it is recommended that you allocate separate server rooms for different services such as web servers, file servers, domain name servers, and email servers at different branches.
Your research should include :
· Logical topology Design
· Justification of the Topology
· VLSM IP Addressing scheme
· Justification of the configuration techniques for different network devices
The findings and outcome of your research should be arranged in a proper flow to be presented to the Technical team who are involved in the full design of the network. In addition, prepare a Cisco Packet Tracer diagram as a proof of concept for your research work.
3. Important Instructions for online submission:
1. The group assignment should be completed in a group ofnot more than4 members. Thegroup documentation andpacket tracer file must besubmitted by the group leader.
2. Select agroup leader among the members for the group assignment.
3. All submissions should be done in Moodle.
4. Double-check the work before online submission and make sure the packet tracer and submitted document are not corrupted.
4. Documentation Instructions.
1. The assignment should attach the front cover, and table of contents, and attach the completedWork Breakdown Structure (WBS) must be digitally signed and agreed upon by all group members.
2. You are required tobuild a completecomputer network environment for the scenario, supported by good research work.
3. Provide configuration of the logical network diagram usingCisco Packet Tracer. Submit the configuration file in Moodle.
4. Your report must be typed using Microsoft Word with Times New Roman font size 12. The report should be in 1.5 spacing.
5. The report has to be well presented and should betyped. Submission of reports that areunprofessional in their look will not fare well when marks are allocated.
6. The report should have a one (1”) margin all around the page as illustrated below:
7. Plagiarism is a serious offense and will automatically be awarded a zero (0) mark.
8. All information, figures, and diagrams obtained from external sources must be referenced using theAPA referencing system accordingly. Refer to the APU Library Website for the APA referencing guide https://library.apiit.edu.my/apa-referencing/
5. Document Format:
1. Cover Page – Student’s name with TP number.
2. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) agreed upon & digitally signed by all members of the group.
3. Table of contents.
4. Student 1: Name with TP number (Malacca Branch)
a. Logical topology Design
b. Justification of the Topology
c. VLSM IP Addressing scheme.
6. Student 2: Name with TP number (Ipoh Branch)
a. Logical topology Design
b. Justification of the Topology
c. VLSM IP Addressing scheme.
7. Student 3: Name with TP number (Kedah Branch)
a. Logical topology Design
b. Justification of the Topology
c. VLSM IP Addressing scheme
8. Student 4: Name with TP number (Perlis Branch)
a. Logical topology Design
b. Justification of the Topology
c. VLSM IP Addressing scheme.
9. Justification of the configuration techniques for different network devices.
a. Brief explanation of configuration on network devices with suitable evidence (supported with screenshot)
10. Conclusion
11. References (APA format)
12. Submit the entire network diagram packet tracer file.
1. Work Breakdown Structure:
|
CLO2: Apply suitable topology, IP addressing scheme and configuration techniques in a network design based on the given scenario |
||||
|
(PLO2: Cognitive Skills) |
||||
|
Introduction - Topology - IP address - Configuration techniques |
||||
|
Report Component
|
Student 1 Branch 1
|
Student 2 Branch 2 |
Student 3 Branch 3 |
Student 4 Branch 4 |
|
Logical topology Design.
Justification of the Topology.
VLSMIP Addressing Scheme.
|
Logical topology Design.
Justification of the Topology.
VLSMIP Addressing Scheme.
|
Logical topology Design.
Justification of the Topology.
VLSMIP Addressing Scheme.
|
Logical topology Design.
Justification of the Topology.
VLSMIP Addressing Scheme.
|
|
|
|
Configuration/Demonstration
|
|||
|
· CLO3: Present network design and configuration using simulation tool.
|
||||
|
(PLO5 – Communication Skills) |
||||
|
Presentation Component |
Branches
Creativity Network Design Technical Concept |
|||
For students who have to re-do the assignment (failed the 1st attempt), produce the assignment individually. Complete both sections and choose one building design for the new submission.
2. Assessment Criteria: Marks Breakdown
|
Assessment Criteria |
Group Assignment |
||||||
|
Marks Awarded |
|||||||
|
Cognitive Skills (60 marks) |
Weight |
Student 1 |
Student 2 |
Student 3 |
Student 4 |
||
|
Network Topology Design |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Topology Justification |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
VLSMIP Addressing Plan & Justification |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Justification of the configuration techniques |
20 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Referencing |
5 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Documentation |
5 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Communication Skills (40 marks) |
Weight |
|
|||||
|
Creativity for network design |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Technical concepts for configuration |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Q & A |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Communication Skills |
10 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Total Marks |
100 |
|
|
|
|
||
3. Marking Rubric
|
Report Components (60%) |
|||||
|
Marking Criteria
|
0-2 (Fail) |
3-4 (Marginal Fail) |
5-6 (Pass) |
7-8 (Credit) |
9-10 (Distinction) |
|
Network Topology Design |
Not able to show good skills in using Cisco Packet Tracer tool.
Network diagram is not clear. |
Able to show sufficient skills in using Cisco Packet Tracer tool.
Minor issues in network diagram (not feasible). |
Able to show good skills in using Cisco Packet Tracer tool.
Feasible network diagram, meeting the minimum requirement of a network. |
Able to show very good skills in using Cisco Packet Tracer tool.
Good network diagram, showing complete layout of the network. |
Proficient in using Cisco Packet Tracer tool.
Very good quality of network diagram, with some complexity of design. |
|
Topology Justification |
Not able to propose for suitable Topology. |
Propose incomplete topology with weak justification |
Propose complete topology with minimal justification. |
Propose good topology with justification, suitable for the scenario.
|
Propose very good topology with justification, suitable the scenario with supporting evidence. |
|
VLSM IP Addressing Plan & Justification |
No explanation to justify the selection of technique for VLSM IP addressing plan and segmentation. |
Almost no relevant explanation to justify the selection of technique for VLSM IP addressing plan and segmentation. |
Appropriate technique chosen for VLSM IP addressing plan and segmentation.
Minimal explanation to justify the plan.
|
Good technique chosen for VLSM IP addressing plan and segmentation.
Adequate supporting evidence to justify the plan. |
Very good technique chosen for VLSM IP addressing plan and segmentation.
Supported with extensive research work for technical accuracy.
|
|
Marking Criteria
|
0-4 (Fail) |
5-8 (Marginal Fail) |
9-12 (Pass) |
13-16 (Credit) |
17-20 (Distinction) |
|
Configuration |
Weak configuration skills. Not able to fully configure the design. |
Limited configuration skills. Only able to meet minimum requirement on the configuration on selected devices. |
Good configuration skills. Able to perform good level of configuration on different types of devices. |
Very good configuration skills. Able to perform some complex configuration on different types of devices.
|
Outstanding configuration skills. Complex configuration on routers, PCs and switches. |
|
Marking Criteria
|
0-1 (Fail) |
2 (Marginal Fail) |
3 (Pass) |
4 (Credit) |
5 (Distinction) |
|
Referencing |
Not able to use referencing tools in Microsoft Word.
No in-text citation and very minimal references. Major issues in the referencing format.
|
Minimal use of referencing tools in Microsoft Word.
Minimal in-text citation and references used. Minor issues in the referencing format.
|
Full use of referencing tools in Microsoft Word.
Enough references and citation in the report. No issue in the referencing format. |
Good use of referencing tools in Microsoft Word.
Recent source of references used,with proper reference list. Limited in-text citation in the report. |
Very good use of referencing tools in Microsoft Word.
Very good quality of references used,with proper citation and reference list for all facts and diagrams used. |
|
Documentation
|
No table of content and page numbering, font size and type are not standardized.
Incomplete assignment requirements.
|
Table of content exist but without page numbers, report structure not standardized.
Assignment requirements are partially completed.
|
Table of content included with proper page numbering, standardized report structure & headings.
Proper introduction conclusion of the report. |
Good structure and flow of documentation with appropriate header & footer.
Good introduction and conclusion of the report.
|
Very good structure and flow of documentation, appropriate header & footer with very good appearance.
Very good introduction and conclusion of the report.
|
|
Presentation Components (40%) |
|||||
|
Marking Criteria
|
0-2 (Fail) |
3-4 (Marginal Fail) |
5-6 (Pass) |
7-8 (Credit) |
9-10 (Distinction) |
|
Creativity for network design |
No emphasis on creativity in the design.
Significant flaws in the design, indicating a lack of understanding of how to incorporate creativity in network design. |
Limited effort made to incorporate creativity in the design.
Some evidence of innovative features or solutions, but not enough to incorporate creativity in network design. |
Good effort made to incorporate creativity in the design.
Evidence of creative thought with some innovative features included in the design. |
Excellent effort made to incorporate creativity in the design.
Evidence of creative thought and design skills, with several innovative features included in the design. |
Outstanding effort made in designing a network that exceeds the requirements and includes many innovative features. |
|
Technical concepts for configuration |
Demonstrates little or no understanding of key network technical concepts.
Makes significant errors in applying basic network concepts. |
Shows some understanding of key network technical concepts but lacks the depth.
|
Demonstrates a basic understanding of key network technical concepts.
Shows some knowledge of key ideas and can apply them to simple problems. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of key network technical concepts.
Shows a strong knowledge of key ideas and can apply them to complex problems. |
Demonstrates a very good understanding of key network technical concepts.
Meets all the requirements of the assignment goes beyond the requirement.
|
|
Q & A |
Provides incorrect answers to questions related to network design and configuration. |
Provides incomplete answers to questions related to network design and configuration. |
Provides consistent but limited answers to questions related to network design and configuration. |
Provides detailed and thoughtful answers to questions related to network design and configurations. |
Provides insightful and high-level technical answers to questions related to network design and configurations. |
|
Communication Skills |
Limited / no presentation and communication skills. |
Poor, unprepared, or minimal presentation skills used. |
Adequate presentation skills, and prepared. |
Excellent presentation skills, and prepared. |
Outstanding presentation skills, and well prepared. |