Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
COMM1190 Data, Insights and Decisions
Assessment Summary
Assessment Task |
Weighting |
Due Date* |
Learning Outcomes |
Assessment 1: Individual Report
Review and revise a report for a large organisation.
|
20% |
Week 4: 5pm Friday 14th March |
CLO1, 2, 3 |
Assessment 2: Team Assessment
Apply key concepts discussed in the course to a real-world scenario
|
30% |
Stage 1: Week 7: 5pm Wednesday 2nd April
Stage 2: Week 9: 5pm Wednesday 16th April
|
CLO2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
Assessment 3: Final Exam
The final exam will test your understanding of course concepts
discussed in all weeks of the course.
|
50% |
Exam period |
CLO1, 2, 3, 5, 6 |
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)
Assessment Details
Turnitin
Turnitin is an originality checking and plagiarism prevention tool that enables checking of submitted written work for improper citation or misappropriated content. Each Turnitin assignment is checked against other students' work, the Internet and key resources selected by your Course Coordinator.
If you are instructed to submit your assessment via Turnitin, you will find the link to the Turnitin submission in your Moodle course site. You can submit your assessment well before the deadline and use the Similarity Report to improve your academic writing skills before submitting your final version.
You can find out more information in the Turnitin information site for students.
Late Submissions
Extensions
Important note:
Special Consideration
Special consideration is the process for assessing the impact of short-term events beyond your control (exceptional circumstances), on your performance in a specific assessment task.
What are circumstances beyond my control?
These are exceptional circumstances or situations that may:
- Prevent you from completing a course requirement,
- Keep you from attending an assessment,
- Stop you from submitting an assessment,
- Significantly affect your assessment performance.
Available here is a list of circumstances that may be beyond your control. This is only a list of examples, and your exact circumstances may not be listed.
You can find more detail and the application form on the Special Consideration site, or in the UNSW Special Consideration Application and Assessment Information for Students.
Assessment overview
The two assessments relate to the same case and basic business problem. You will be acting as an analyst reporting to the Head of Management Services of a grocery store chain operating throughout Australia. She is interested in knowing more about the customers enrolled in their rewards program and how their characteristics and spending patterns inform management about customer loyalty and retention—their customer churn problem.
Context of assessment task
To support this initiative, the GM has provided a report drafted by a recently hired junior analyst. However, he has raisedconcerns about its quality in both form and substance. Your role is to critically review the initial report, refine the analysis,and produce a revised version using an updated and expanded dataset. This dataset includes the original pilot data as well as additional observations, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of park operations.
Park remains a top destination while maximizing efficiency and profitability.
Subject: Report revision project
Good morning,
The primary focus of this revision should be identifying the factors contributing to low revenue at the theme park. I am looking for an in-depth analysis of the reasons behind underperformance in our revenue streams.
This analysis will serve as the first step in a broader effort to increase both revenue and customer repeated visits atthe park. Understanding the drivers behind low revenue will be critical as we work toward maximizing our profitability and customer experience.
This revised report is crucial for our strategic efforts to identify and address the causes of low revenue, helping us take the necessary steps to improve our offerings and guest experience moving forward. The dataset you will use contains both the initial data used by the junior analyst, as well as some additional data collected after the fact. I will provide access to these data and a copy of the original report in a separate communication.
Good luck with the project. I look forward to seeing what you come up with.
Approach to the assessment task
Feedback
Assessment 2: Team Assessment
Assessment Overview
Instructions
Approach to assessment task
Assessment 3: Final Exam
The final exam will test your technical competence and problem-solving skills, as well as your understanding of the concepts discussed in all weeks of the course. A range of questions and examples drawn from past exams will be provided later.
Marking Rubric
INDIVIDUAL REPORT | Assessment 1
Criteria |
% |
Fail
(0%-49%)
|
Pass
(50%-64%)
|
Credit
(65%-74%)
|
Distinction
(75%-84%)
|
High Distinction
(85%-100%)
|
Analysis |
30% |
Fails to demonstrate a basic understanding of the business problem or issue, and the appropriate tools and methods to derive insights from data. Demonstrates limited awareness of the key problems in the initial report and uses poor judgment in deciding what should be highlighted and how it is reported.
|
Demonstrates a proficient understanding of the business problem or issue, and the appropriate tools and methods necessary to extract useful insights from the data. Recognizes some of the key problems in the initial report and attempts to address some of the errors and omissions. Shows basic understanding of what should be highlighted and how it is reported, but some topics are irrelevant and/or not well-supported by the data.
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of the business problem or issue, and the appropriate tools and methods necessary to extract useful insights from the data. Recognizes some of the key problems in the initial report and effectively addresses some of the errors and omissions. Generally, shows good judgement in deciding what should be highlighted and how it is reported, but some topics are not as relevant and/or not well-supported by the data.
|
Demonstrates an advanced understanding of the business problem or issue, and the appropriate tools and methods necessary to extract useful insights from the data. Recognizes most key problems in the initial report and effectively addresses any errors and omissions. Uses good judgment in deciding what should behighlighted and how it is reported.
|
Demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the business problem or issue, and the appropriate tools and methods necessary to extract useful insights from the data. Recognizes all key problems in the initial report and expertly addresses any errors and omissions. Uses excellent judgement in deciding what should be highlighted and how it
is reported.
|
Quality of
conclusions and
recommendations
|
20% |
Develops no conclusions or conclusions that are not based on the results of the analysis. Recommendations are absent or do not provide useful advice on how to address data deficiencies.
|
Develops appropriate conclusions although not always closely linked to the results of the analysis. Recommendations identify some deficiencies in the data and there is an attempt to provide advice on how to address them.
|
Develops appropriate conclusions based on the results of the analysis. Recommendations identify some deficiencies in the data and provide some advice on how to address them.
|
Develops well-reasoned and appropriate conclusions based on the results of the analysis. Recommendations identify key deficiencies in the data and provide good advice on how to address them.
|
Develops well-reasoned and insightful conclusions that are fully supported by, and closely linked to, the results of the analysis. Recommendations identify key deficiencies in the data and provide perceptive advice on how to address them.
|
Visualisation |
40% |
Inappropriate use of visualisations and graphs do not communicate insights effectively. Graphs are unsatisfactory and unprofessional.
|
Some but not all chosen visualisations are appropriate or effectively communicate insights. Graphs are satisfactory and mostly presented professionally.
|
Good choice of appropriate visualisations to effectively communicate insights. Most graphs communicate an important insight. Graphs are good quality and mostly presented professionally.
|
Very good choice of appropriate visualisations to effectively communicate key insights. Most graphs communicate an important insight. Graphs are good quality and presented professionally.
|
Excellent choice of appropriate visualisations to effectively communicate key insights. All graphs communicate an important insight. Graphs are high quality and presented professionally.
|
Criteria |
|
Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory |
|||
Report length |
10% |
Did not follow the instructions of the Head and produced a report that differs markedly from that of the junior analyst. Report may be too brief or too long. | Followed instructions of the Head and produced a report with a structure that approximates that of the junior analyst. UNSW Business School |