Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
Assessment Brief 2024/25
Please make sure you carefully read and understand the question or task. If you have unanswered questions, please post these on the course Moodle Discussion Forum, and we’ll respond.
|
Course Code |
MGT4051 |
|
Course Title |
Management in the Voluntary and Community Sector |
|
Course Coordinator |
Saurabh Lall |
|
Weighting |
40% |
|
Question release date |
27th February 2025 |
|
Submission date: |
20 th March 2025, 12pm |
|
Grades and Feedback to be released on: |
10 th April 2025 |
|
Word limit |
1000 word countt(+/- 10%) |
|
Action to be taken if word limit is exceeded |
Apply a penalty of one secondary band, to students who exceed the word limit by more than 10% |
1. Question
Critically reflect on an issue or situation you have experienced or identified in a real VCSO or the VCS as a whole. This should be done via your involvement within a VCSO e.g. as an employee/volunteer/trustee, or via one of the case studies provided on Moodle.2
2. Further Details
3. Assessment Rubric/Criteria
|
Criteria |
Below Expectation |
To Expectation |
Above Expectation |
|
Organisation of content |
Lack of coherent structure, for example, no sign-posting and no clear logical progression of a narrative clearly related to the assignment questions. It is difficult to relate some parts of the assignment to the assignment question. |
Most elements of the assignment are clearly aligned to the assignment question and the reader is often helped to understand the purpose of the sections through sign-posting and linkage between arguments. |
All elements of the text are clearly and logically related to the overall assignment question, for example, evidenced by a clear opener that introduces the reader to the topic and sets out the structure of the paper. Subsequent use of sub-headings and/or signposting is instrumental to organising content and helps the reader to understand the flow of the text. The reader is never in doubt about the relevance of a given section or paragraph. |
|
Clarity of concepts and context |
Limited ability in outlining and explaining key terminology,concepts and contexts. |
Demonstrates ability to outline, define and explain the relevant terminology, concepts and contexts. |
Key terminology, concepts and contexts are outlined, defined and explained in a clear, concise and nuanced manner that demonstrates an excellent level of 3 understanding of them and critical evaluation of their relevance for the assignment question. |
|
Critical engagement with literature |
Insufficient or unsuitable range of literature used to discuss the assignment question (e.g. no or limited use of peer-reviewed articles or text books). Limited linkages made with the assignment question. |
Clear evidence of relevant literature (e.g. peer-reviewed papers published in VCS management related journals or key text books) used to answer the assignment question, but the engagement with key sources is descriptive (e.g. insights from literature is summarised, but not related critically to the assignment question). |
Excellent engagement with and employment of key literature and theories (e.g. peer-reviewed papers published in VCS management related journals and key text books, focused on relevant management approaches) in analysing your chosen challenge. Clear rationale of your selections of relevant management literature and approaches used to answer the assignment question. |
|
Developing ideas |
No clear evidence of attempt to develop own ideas or critique of existing ideas. |
Clear evidence of development of own ideas and/or critique of existing ideas, but with the underlying justification needing further reinforcement. Discussion and conclusions are more descriptive than analytical. |
Clear evidence of development of own ideas and/or critique of existing ideas, with an advanced use of independent reasoning to underpin and motivate own views. This is evidenced through focusing the discussion and conclusions on suggesting creative solutions to address challenge. |
4. Feedback
Students can use academic staff office hours for additional feedback on your work.
5. Submitting
Document creation- Individual Written
StudentID_CourseCode_QuestionNo. e.g. 7299019_MGT4051_1. If there is no question choice, use 1 as the default.
1. Student conduct
Plagiarism
• Student Learning Development web pages• University Plagiarism Statement
Your coursework will be processed through Turnitin for similarity checking. You can submit a draft of your coursework to Turnitin before submitting your final copy. You will find information about using Turnitin in the Student Information Point Moodle [USIP/PSIP]
2. Generative AI
Copying (including paraphrasing) AI responses to queries would be considered as plagiarism, as it would for copying the response from any internet search.
Further information can be found here.
8. Extensions and non-submission with good cause
If you experience extenuating circumstances which prevent you from completing your assessment by the deadline, you can request an extension of up to 5 days via Moodle.
We understand that during your studies, events that you cannot control (e.g., death of a family member, personal circumstances, physical and mental ill health, etc.) may impact your ability to perform well in or complete assessments.
If you are experiencing such circumstances, you can submit a good cause claim in MyCampus.
You have five working days from the assessment deadline date to submit your good cause claim. If you are prevented from submitting your claim within five days for good reason, you must detail this in your claim. You will receive an acknowledgement on MyCampus when you submit. After you have submitted your claim, you have five working days to retract it.
If you have any questions, please contact your subject team: [email protected]