MATH253 Week 7 Tutorial

MATH253 Week 7 Tutorial

This tutorial sheet is related to material covered in chapters  10 and  11.   Some  of the  questions will be discussed in On Campus Workshop in Week 7.  Please study the chapters 10 and 11 before attending the On Campus Workshop in Week 7.

Solutions will be available on Canvas on Friday at 5pm.

1.  The following are the weight losses, in milligrams, of certain machine parts due to friction, when they were used with diferent lubricants.


Lubricant X: 12, 11, 7, 13, 9, 11, 12, 9


LubricantY:    8, 10, 7, 5, 6, 10, 7, 8, 11, 7, 8

LubricantZ:    9, 3, 7, 8, 4, 6, 6, 5

We want to test whether there are any diferences between the three lubricants in terms of the mean weight loss due to friction.

(a) Write down the null and alternative hypotheses to be tested.

(b)  Showing the details of your calculations, write down the ANOVA table and carry out the appro- priate hypothesis test.

(c) What are the underlying assumptions for the validity of this test?

2.  A total of 30 mothers, each of whom had an 18-month-old baby, agreed to take part in a study of children’s development. The mothers were randomly divided into three groups of 10, that did not meet each other.
Group 1 was given a simple instruction session on how best to provide a healthy diet for their children. Group 2 was given a session of the same length explaining how small children could be taught to read. Group 3 was given several sessions on how small children could be taught to read and was also given suitable teaching materials.
About one-third of the families moved out of the area and could not be followed up; however, at the age of 8, the remainder of the children were tested for reading ability and comprehension.  The test scores and associated summary statistics were as follows:


x

s2

Group 1

101      88 97 84 114 102     82 128

99.500

245.143

Group 2

88 104      98 118 127

107.000

243.000

Group 3

126 128 157 134 122 109

129.333

253.467

R output from the Analysis of Variance included the following.

Df         Sum  Sq      Mean  Sq      F  value    Pr(>F)

ind                    2           3154              1577.2        6.38        0.00918

Residuals      16         3955                247.2

Anderson-Darling  normality  test

data:    residuals

A  =  0.34627,  p-value  =  0.4437

(a)  Does the assumption of equal variances seem justiied for these data?

(b)  Does the assumption of normally distributed errors seem justiied for these data? (c) What conclusion can be drawn from the ANOVA analysis?

3.  A farmer has three similar tomato patches.  For the last  10 years, he has treated each patch with a diferent type of fertiliser (Type 1, Type 2, Type 3) to determine whether the type of fertiliser may inluence tomato yield (occasionally a crop is lost due to external factors, and such observations are not considered). Each ield starts with the same number of tomato seeds which are otherwise planted in the same way.  Assume that tomato yield is normally distributed for each type of fertiliser.  The data are summarised below in kilograms.

Type 1

Type 2

Type 3

113.3

101.1

72.3

101.4

92.6

117.5

110.8

143.2

100.4

139.5

127.9

142.0

166.8

165.7

101.0

136.3

134.0

131.2

174.7

127.1

110.1

84.5

116.8

113.1

143.0

128.2

Sample Means

105.844

141.910

117.543

Sample Variances

372.998

482.792

336.750

(a)  Perform Analysis of Variance to test an appropriate hypothesis for these data.  Report your con- clusions.

(b)  Perform post-hoc tests for these data. Report your conclusions.


发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注