Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
Assessment 1 Information
Subject Code: TECH4200
Subject Name: Website Development
Assessment Title: Case Study Evaluation
Assessment Type: Individual
Word Count: 1500 Words (+/-10%)
Weighting: 30 %
Total Marks: 30
Submission: Via MyKBS
Due Date: Week 4
Your Task
This assessment is to be completed individually. In this assessment, you will develop a written assessment in the form of a report to evaluate the client-server architecture of websites and its relationship with browser behaviour.Page 2
Kaplan Business School Assessment Outline
Assessment Description
The assessment will require students to write a comprehensive report that evaluates the client server architecture of websites and critically analyses its associated relationship with browser behaviour. Students should demonstrate their ability to assess and evaluate the concepts, identify limitations, propose improvements, and analyse the impact of this architecture on browser behaviour.
This assessment aims to achieve the following subject learning outcomes:
LO1 Evaluate the client-server architecture of websites and the associated relationship with browser behaviour.
Assessment Instructions
Students must conduct research externally and included references in order to produce a well referenced assessment. You should use at least ten (10) sources of information and reference these in accordance with the Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. These may include websites, social media sites, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. These references should be presented as in-text citations and a referencing list at the end of your assessment (not included in the word limit). Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used.
1. You must submit your report in Word document or in PDF format.
2. The report should be well-structured and organised. It should include an introduction, body, and conclusion.
3. Your report should include the following:
a) Introduction: Provide a concise overview of the client-server architecture, its significance, and its influence on web development and browser behaviour.b) Client-Side Components: Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the key components involved in the client-side of the architecture, such as the web browser, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Assess their functionalities, limitations, and impact on browser behaviour.c) Server-Side Components: Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the key components involved in the server-side of the architecture, such as the web server, application server, and database. Assess their functionalities, performance, scalability, and security aspects.d) Communication and Data Exchange: Evaluate the communication protocols used in client server interactions, such as HTTP, and critically analyse their strengths and weaknesses. Assess the efficiency and security of data exchange methods, including request/response handling and data formats (e.g., JSON, XML).e) Impact on Browser Behaviour: Conduct a critical analysis of how the client-server architecture influences various aspects of browser behaviour, including rendering, page loading, caching, and handling user interactions. Identify limitations and propose potential improvements or alternative approaches.f) Emerging Trends and Future Directions: Discuss emerging trends and advancements in the client-server architecture and their potential impact on browser behaviour. Evaluate their potential benefits, challenges, and implications for web development.g) Conclusion: Summarise the key findings and insights from the report, highlighting the critical evaluation of the client-server architecture and its relationship with browser behaviour.
4. The report should be properly referenced using appropriate academic sources.
5. Provide examples and illustrations to support your analysis.
6. Use clear and concise language to communicate your ideas effectively.
7. Please refer to the assessment marking guide to assist you in completing all the assessment criteria.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
Please read the policy to learn the answers to these questions:
• What is academic integrity and misconduct?• What are the penalties for academic misconduct?• How can I appeal my grade?
Late submission of assignments (within the Assessment Policy)
https://www.kbs.edu.au/admissions/forms-and-policies
Length Limits for Assessments
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Generative AI Traffic Lights
Please see the level of Generative AI that this assessment is Level 2 has been designed to accept:
|
Traffic Light |
Amount of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenerativeAI) usage |
Evidence Required |
This assessment (✓)
|
|
Level 1 |
Prohibited:
No GenerativeAI allowed
This assessment showcases your individual
knowledge, skills and/or personal experiences in the
absence of Generative AI support.
|
The use of generative AI is prohibited for this
assessment and may potentially result in
penalties for academic misconduct, including but
not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment.
|
|
|
Level 2 |
Optional:
You may use GenerativeAI for research and
content generation that is appropriately
referenced.
See assessment instructions for details
This assessment allows you to engage with
Generative AI as a means of expanding your
understanding, creativity, and idea generation in the
research phase of your assessment and to produce
content that enhances your assessment. I.e.,
images. You do not have to use it.
|
The use of GenAI is optional for this
assessment.
Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be
clearly referenced just as you would reference
any other resource type used. Click on the link
below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI.
https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing
other-sources/referencing-other-sources
generative-ai
In addition, you must include an appendix that
documents your GenerativeAI collaboration
including all prompts and responses used for the
assessment.
Unapproved use of generative AI as per
assessment details during the content generation
parts of your assessment may potentially result
in penalties for academic misconduct, including
but not limited to a mark of zero for the
assessment. Ensure you follow the specific
assessment instructions in the section above.
|
✓ |
|
Level 3 |
Compulsory:
You must use GenerativeAI to complete your
assessment
See assessment instruction for details
This assessment fully integrates Generative AI,
allowing you to harness the technology's full
potential in collaboration with your own expertise.
Always check your assessment instructions carefully
as there may still be limitations on what constitutes
acceptable use, and these may be specific to each
assessment.
|
You will be taught how to use generative AI and
assessed on its use.
Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be
clearly referenced just as you would reference
any other resource type used. Click on the link
below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI.
https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing
other-sources/referencing-other-sources
generative-ai
In addition, you must include an appendix that
documents your GenerativeAI collaboration
including all prompts and responses used for the
assessment.
Unapproved use of generative AI as per
assessment details during the content generation
parts of your assessment may potentially result
in penalties for academic misconduct, including
but not limited to a mark of zero for the
assessment. Ensure you follow the specific
assessment instructions in the section above.
|
|
Assessment Marking Guide
|
Marking Criteria_____| 30 marks |
F (Fail)
0 – 49%
|
P (Pass)
50 – 64%
|
C (Credit)
65 – 74%
|
D (Distinction)
75 – 84%
|
HD (High Distinction)
85 – 100%
|
|
Evaluation of client-server architecture
_____| 4 marks
|
Limited or no evaluation of the client-server architecture of websites and its relationship with browser behaviour.
|
Provides a basic evaluation of the client-server architecture of websites and its relationship with browser behaviour.
|
Provides a thorough evaluation of the client-server architectur of websites and its relationship with browser behaviour.
|
Provides a Comprehensive evaluation of the client-server architecture of websites and its relationship with browser behaviour, highlighting strengths, limitations, and potential improvements.
|
Provides an exceptional evaluation of the client - server architecture of websites and its relationship with browser behaviour,demonstrating sophisticated analysis,deep insights, andproposing innovativeapproaches and solutions.
|
|
Critical analysis of
key components _____| 8 marks
|
Provides limited or no critical analysis of the key components involved in the client-server architecture.
|
Provides a basic critical analysis of the key components involved in the client-server architecture.
|
Provides a comprehensive criticalanalysis of the key components involved in the client-server architecture, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement.
|
Provides a thorough and insightful critical analysis of the key components involved in the client-server architecture, demonstrating a nuanced understanding and proposing innovative approaches to address limitations.
|
Provides an exceptional critical analysis of the key components involved in the client-server architecture, offering profound insights, addressing complex challenges, and proposing highly innovative and effective solutions.
|
|
Evaluation of
communication and
data exchange
_____| 4 marks |
Limited or no evaluation of the communication protocols and data exchange methods used in client-server interactions.
|
Provides a basic evaluation of the communication protocols and data exchange methods used in client-server interactions.
|
Provides a thorough evaluation of the communication protocols and data exchange methods used in client-server interactions, analysing their strengths, weaknesses, and implications for efficiency and security.
|
Provides a comprehensive
evaluation of the communication protocols and data exchange methods used in client-server interactions, offering insightful analysis and proposing improvements to enhance efficiency and security.
|
Provides an exceptional evaluation of the communication
protocols and data exchange methods used in client-server
interactions, showcasing in-depth analysis, innovative approaches, and advanced security considerations to ensure optimal performance and security.
|
|
Critical analysis of
impact on browser
behaviour
_____| 4 marks
|
Lacks critical analysisof how the client server architecture influences browser behaviour.
|
Provides a basic critical analysis of how the client-server architecture influences browser behaviour.
|
Provides a comprehensive critical
analysis of how the
client-server
architecture influences
browser behaviour,
identifying limitations,
challenges, and
potential areas for
improvement.
|
Provides a thorough
and insightful critical
analysis of how the
client-server
architecture influences
browser behaviour,
highlighting the impact,
proposing innovative
solutions, and
addressing complex
aspects of browser
behaviour.
|
Provides an exceptional
critical analysis of how
the client-server
architecture influences
browser behaviour,
offering profound
insights, addressing
complex challenges,
and proposing highly
innovative and effective
solutions to enhance
browser behaviour.
|
|
Evaluation of
emerging trends and
future
_____| 4 marks
|
Provides limited or no evaluation of emerging trends and future directions in the client-server architecture and their potential impact on browser behaviour.
|
Provides a basic evaluation of emerging trends and future directions in the client-server architecture and Their potential impact on browser behaviour.
|
Provides a thorough
evaluation of emerging
trends and future
directions in the client
server architecture and
their potential impact
on browser behaviour,
analysing benefits,
challenges, and
implications for web
development.
|
Provides a
comprehensive
evaluation of emerging
trends and future
directions in the client
server architecture and
their potential impact
on browser behaviour,
offering insightful
analysis, addressing
challenges, and
proposing innovative
solutions.
|
Provides an exceptional
evaluation of emerging
trends and future
directions in the client
server architecture and
their potential impact on
browser behaviour,
showcasing deep
insights, advanced
analysis, and proposing
groundbreaking
approaches for future
web development.
|
|
Use of References
and Research
_____| 3 marks
|
Uses inadequate or
inappropriate sources of information, including Wikipedia or popular sites, with limited or no in-text citations and referencing list.
|
Uses a minimum of ten (10) sources of information, appropriately
referenced using the
Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style, with some minor errors in intext citations and referencing list.
|
Uses at least ten (10)
sources of information,
appropriately
referenced using the
Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style, with
consistent and accurate
in-text citations and
referencing list.
|
Uses at least ten (10)
sources of information,
appropriately
referenced using the
Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style, with
accurate and well
integrated in-text
citations and
referencing list.
|
Uses at least ten (10)
high-quality sources of
information,
appropriately
referenced using the
Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style, with
accurate and well
integrated in-text
citations and
referencing list.
|
|
Grammar, Spelling, and Formatting of the
Report
_____| 3 marks
|
Contains frequent grammatical, spelling, and formatting errors that hinder the readability and comprehension of the report.
|
Contains some grammatical, spelling, and formatting errors, but overall, the report is mostly clear and comprehensible.
|
Contains few grammatical, spelling, and formatting errors, with a clear and readable report.
|
Demonstrates a high level of grammatical accuracy, spelling, and formatting, enhancing the clarity and professionalism of the report.
|
Exhibits exceptional grammatical accuracy, spelling, and formatting, resulting in a polished, error-free, and professional report.
|
|
Feedback and grades will be released via MyKBS |
|||||