Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
EST 201 Technological Trends in Society
Part 1: Course Overview
Course Information:
Course Title: Technological Trends in Society
Course catalog # and section: EST 201 Section TBA Credit hours: 3
Semester: SUMMER
Course Meeting Time/Delivery Mode: Online
General education designation(s) (SBC): STAS
Prerequisites: one D.E.C E or SNW Course
Required Course Textbooks and Materials: There is no textbook for the course. Readings will be accessed from the Library and via Bright Space
Course Description: Explores the impact of technology and engineering design on society's past, present, and future. The main themes as they relate to changing technology are industry and the economy; the environment; social, educational, and psychological implications of computers; energy and society; warfare; and 21st-century emerging technologies.
Course Delivery Mode and Structure:
This is an online course. All assignments and course interactions will utilize Internet technologies. See the “Technical Requirements'' section for more information. In Bright Space, you will access online lessons, lectures, course materials, and resources.
Instructor Information:
Instructor name: Edwin Tjoe
Instructor’s Stony Brook email: [email protected]
Instructor’s phone number: 631-444-4306
• Calls only accepted Thursdays and Fridays 9 am to 12 pm
Instructor’s time zone: Eastern Time (ET)
Virtual Office hours: Thursday and Fridays 9 am to 12 pm
How We Will Communicate:
Regular, professional, and respectful communication is essential in online classes. Review the Online Communication Guidelines carefully and contact me with any questions you may have.
To make sure you are receiving all communication in this course:
● Log into Bright Space once a day, and check announcements and the discussion board.
● Regular Announcements will be posted in Bright Space and may or may not be sent via email.
● Course-related questions should be posted in the General Questions forum in the course Discussion board, so everyone can benefit.
● For personal/private issues, email me directly. If you use Bright Space email tool from the course site, it will automatically include your full name, course name, and section when you send me an email. Please allow between 24 hours for an email reply Monday to Friday 9-430pm, On the weekends, my email will not be checked.
● Your Stony Brook University email must be used for all University-related communications. All instructor correspondence will be sent to your SBU email account. Plan on checking your SBU email account regularly for course-related messages. To log in to Stony Brook Google Mail, go to http://www.stonybrook.edu/mycloud and sign in with your NetID and password.
My Role as the Instructor in Class Discussions:
As the instructor, I will serve as a “guide” in our online classroom. Discussions through Bright Space encourage conversation and learning with your peers. While I might not respond to every post, I will read what is posted, and reply to:
● assist each of you when it comes to making connections between discussion, lectures, and readings.
● fill in important points that may have been missed.
● re-direct discussion if it gets “off track.”
● highlight key points or identify valuable posts.
I might also summarize at the end of each discussion, module, or week.
How to Succeed in this Course:
Online learning requires more from students. You will need to take greater responsibility for managing your time and participating fully in the class. For asynchronous classes, you should set aside 5-10 hours per week. For synchronous and blended learning, slightly less. For this class, you must also
● Check Bright Space and your SBU email regularly
● Keep track of all due dates and plan!
● Complete all assigned readings in the course
● Complete all graded assignments on time
There are multiple resources, university offices, and help desks that are available to assist you with everything from advising, tutoring, accessibility, online-specific support, and much more.
Review some Academic Success Strategies and visit the Student Resources page to ensure your success in this course.
Technical Requirements:
Having a reliable computer and Internet connection throughout the term will benefit you. Caution! For many classes, you will be at a disadvantage if you attempt to complete all coursework on a smartphone or tablet. It may not be possible to submit the files required for your homework assignments. If you need to borrow a device, please visit SBU’s Laptop Loan Program.
You will need Microsoft Office to complete this course.
Technical Assistance:
If you need technical assistance at any time during the course or to report a problem with Bright Space you can:
Part 2: Course Learning Objectives
Upon completion of the course, students will be able to:
1. Describe the history of the information professions and understand the changing roles of information professionals in a global environment.
2. Identify and analyze emerging and current trends in technology.
3. Promote and demonstrate the use of ethical standards in the creation, management, and use of information.
4. Recognize the crucial role of users in the development and delivery of user-centered information systems and services.
5. Describe and discuss the ethics, impacts, and consequences of current trends within technology on society.
6. Effectively predict attributes, risks, benefits, and trajectory of technological trends.
7. Utilize research and metrics to make educated decisions for career growth and specialization through trends in technology.
Part 3: Course Schedule
Refer to the course calendar. The possibility exists that unforeseen events will make schedule changes necessary. Any changes will be noted in course Announcements or through Stony Brook email.
Part 4: Grading, Attendance, and Late Work Policies
Points and feedback for graded activities will be posted to the Grades area.
In this course, you will be assessed on the following:
Activity/Assignment Points Due Date
Discussion boards (10) 40 Weekly
VoiceThread 20 See Brightspace
Attendance 10 See Brightspace
Exams 30 See Brightspace
Total 100
Letter Grades:
Letter Grade Points or Percentage
A 90.001 and above
A- 85.001 and 90
B+ 80.001 and 85
B 75.001 and 80
B- 70.001 and 75
C+ 65.001 and 70
C 60.001 and 65
C- 55.001 and 60
D+ 50.001 and 55
D 45.001 and 50
F 0 and 45
Discussion Board Assignments
Discussions consist of watching/listening to a podcast from TED/PBS/iTunes University/etc; answering a weekly reflection question; and articulating to the class in discussion why you think your reflection is correct.
You are required to: (1) reply to the discussion board topic/question by creating a thread (two paragraphs), and (2) make three responses to other students (one paragraph, each). That is a total of 4 required responses. A paragraph is at least 5 sentences long. Don’t forget to cite your resources.
You will be expected to actively participate in all group discussions. Active participation means providing meaningful expression and well-thought-out answers to instructor questions. A short answer like “I agree or disagree” does not constitute meaningful dialogue and will not be counted toward your participation grade.
Each discussion will have a beginning and ending date. Posting after the discussion’s ending date and time will not be graded.
Attendance Policy:
Attendance is based on weekly discussion participation and review of course content.
Late Work Policy:
Late work will not be accepted. However extra credit will be available for most all assignments. Please make every effort to complete work promptly. The extra credit available during the semester is a deviation harder than the assignments in this course.
Discussion Board Grading Rubric
Based on the modification of the Association of American Colleges & Universities VALUE Rubrics
VALUE (Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education) is a campus-based assessment approach developed and led by AAC&U as part of its Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) initiative. VALUE rubrics provide needed tools to assess students’ authentic work, produced across students’ diverse learning pathways, fields of study, and institutions, to determine whether and how well students are meeting graduation-level achievement in learning outcomes that both employers and faculty consider essential. Teams of faculty and other educational professionals from institutions across the country—two- and four-year, private and public, research and liberal arts, large and small—developed rubrics for sixteen Essential Learning Outcomes that all students need for success in work, citizenship, and life. The VALUE rubrics are being used to help institutions demonstrate, share, and assess student accomplishment of progressively more advanced and integrative learning.
Since their release in the fall of 2009, the rubrics have become a widely referenced and utilized form of assessment on campuses across the United States and
internationally. As of December 2015, the rubrics have been accessed by more than 42,000 individuals from more than 4,200 unique institutions, including more than 2,800 colleges and universities. The VALUE rubrics have also been approved for use in meeting national standards for accountability established by the Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA), and are used in all regional and some professional self-study reports and reviews for accreditation.
The VALUE rubrics include Inquiry and Analysis, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, Written Communication, Oral Communication, Quantitative Literacy, Information Literacy, Reading, Teamwork, Problem Solving, Civic Knowledge and Engagement— Local and Global, Intercultural Knowledge and Competence, Ethical Reasoning and Action, Global Learning, Foundations and Skills for Lifelong Learning, and Integrative Learning.
Critical Thinking VALUE RUBRIC
Definition
Critical thinking is a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion.
Framing Language
This rubric is designed to be transdisciplinary, reflecting the recognition that success in all disciplines requires habits of inquiry and analysis that share common
attributes. Further, research suggests that successful critical thinkers from all disciplines increasingly need to be able to apply those habits in various and changing situations encountered in all walks of life.
This rubric is designed for use with many different types of assignments and the suggestions here are not an exhaustive list of possibilities. Critical thinking can be demonstrated in assignments that require students to complete analyses of text, data, or issues. Assignments that cut across presentation mode might be especially useful in some fields. If insight into the process components of critical thinking (e.g., how information sources were evaluated regardless of whether they were included in the product) is important, assignments focused on student reflection might be especially illuminating.
Glossary
The definitions that follow were developed to clarify terms and concepts used in this rubric only.
• Ambiguity: Information that may be interpreted in more than one way.
• Assumptions: Ideas, conditions, or beliefs (often implicit or unstated) that are "taken for granted or accepted as true without proof." (quoted
from www.dictionary.reference.com/browse/assumptions)
• Context: The historical, ethical. political, cultural, environmental, or circumstantial settings or conditions that influence and complicate the consideration of any issues, ideas, artifacts, and events.
• Literal meaning: Interpretation of information exactly as stated. For example, "she was green with envy" would be interpreted to mean that her skin was green.
• Metaphor: Information that is (intended to be) interpreted in a non-literal
way. For example, "she was green with envy" is intended to convey an intensity of emotion, not a skin color.
|
Benchmark 1 |
Milestones 2 3 |
Capstone 4 |
|
Explanation of issues |
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. |
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown. |
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. |
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. |
Evidence Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion |
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question. |
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning. |
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning. |
Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly. |
Influence of context and assumptions |
Shows an emerging awareness of present assumptions (sometimes labels assertions as assumptions). Begins to identify some contexts when presenting a position. |
Questions some assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts when presenting a position. May be more aware of others’ assumptions than one’s own (or vice versa). |
Identifies own and others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when presenting a position. |
Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position. |
Student’s position |
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious. |
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue. |
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis). |
Specific position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis) are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within position (perspective, thesis/ hypothesis). |
Conclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences) |
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. |
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. |
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. |
Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. |
Part 5: University and Course Policies
University Policies:
Student Accessibility Support Center Statement
If you have a physical, psychological, medical, or learning disability that may impact your course work, please contact the Student Accessibility Support Center, Stony Brook Union Suite 107, (631) 632-6748, or at [email protected]. They will determine with you what accommodations are necessary and appropriate. All information and documentation is confidential.
Students who require assistance during emergency evacuation are encouraged to discuss their needs with their professors and the Student Accessibility Support Center. For procedures and information go to the following website: https://ehs.stonybrook.edu/programs/fire-safety/emergency-evacuation/evacuation-guide-disabilities and search Fire Safety and Evacuation and Disabilities.
Academic Integrity Statement
Each student must pursue his or her academic goals honestly and be personally accountable for all submitted work. Representing another person's work as your own is always wrong. Faculty is required to report any suspected instances of academic dishonesty to the Academic Judiciary. Faculty in the Health Sciences Center (School of Health Technology & Management, Nursing, Social Welfare, Dental Medicine) and School of Medicine are required to follow their school-specific procedures. For more comprehensive information on academic integrity, including categories of academic dishonesty please refer to the academic judiciary website at http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/academic_integrity/index.html
Critical Incident Management
Stony Brook University expects students to respect the rights, privileges, and property of other people. Faculty are required to report to the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards any disruptive behavior that interrupts their ability to teach, compromises the safety of the learning environment, or inhibits students' ability to learn. Faculty in the HSC Schools and the School of Medicine are required to follow their school-specific procedures. Further information about most academic matters can be found in the Undergraduate Bulletin, the Undergraduate Class Schedule, and the Faculty-Employee Handbook.