ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF |
|
Subject Code and Title |
CAO107 Computer Architecture & Operating Systems |
Assessment |
Practical implementation of hardware and operating systems |
Individual/Group |
Individual |
Length |
1000 words (+/- 10%) |
Learning Outcomes |
The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by the successful completion of the task below include:
b) Explain the structure of modern operating systems, including types, features, and functions.
c) Identify how operating systems facilitate computer system components to work.
|
Submission |
Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 08. |
Weighting |
40% |
Total Marks |
100 marks |
In each organisation, the IT department is responsible to provide support related to computer hardware, software, network management, applications update, and keep the system running seamlessly that improves the organisation’s overall performance, production, and bring better return of the revenue. Due to the recent rapid business requirements changes like high-performance computer hardware /software applications and secure from the cyber-attacks, the operating system keeps updates itself. If these updates are done on time, then, the system performance improves, and systems are also prevented from malware attacks. These changes can be done weekly, monthly, quarterly, or annually.
In this assessment, you are to demonstrate your understanding of the structure of modern operating systems, including types, features, and functions, and identify how these operating systems facilitate computer system components to work in the report.
Assessment Attributes |
Fail
(Yet to achieve
minimum standard)
0-49%
|
Pass
(Functional)
50-64%
|
Credit
(Proficient)
65-74%
|
Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84%
|
High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
|
Task 1 Major Operating Systems: Demonstrated understanding of the task and applied knowledge in computer architecture to answer the given task/problem. Marks for this criterion = 25% |
• Explanation of the major operating system vendor and identifying the installation of patches timing and frequency tasks indicates large gaps with the task description. Overall, the answer layout, detail, content and technical justification needs major improvement. |
• Explanation of the major operating system vendorand identifying the installation of patches timing and frequency task indicates considerable gaps with the task description. Overall, there are several inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. High improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation of the major operating system vendor and identifying the installation of patches timing and frequency task indicates some gaps with the task description. Overall, there are inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. More improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation of the major operating system vendor and identifying the installation of patches timing and frequency task indicates a few important gaps with the task description. Overall, there are a few inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. Minor improvement is required. |
Explanation of the major operating system vendor and identifying the installation of patches timing and frequency task indicates no or very minimal important gaps with the task description. Overall, the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification are very well done and consistent with the task. |
Task 2 Software Inventory of Computer System: Demonstrated understanding of the task and applied knowledge in computer system software inventory to answer the given task/problem. Marks for this criterion = 25% |
• Explanation of the software inventory performance on the personal (or colleagues) computer, identification of applications, and recommendation for the patches task indicates large gaps with the task description. Overall, there are major inconsistencies in the answer content detail, and technical justification. Major changes are required to improve the answers. |
• Explanation of the software inventory performance on the personal (or colleagues) computer, identification of applications, and recommendation for the patches task indicates considerable gaps with the task description. Overall, there are several
inconsistencies in the answer content, detail, and technical justification. High improvement is required in the answers.
|
• Explanation of the software inventory performance on the personal (or colleagues) computer, identification of applications, and recommendation for the patches task indicates some gaps with the task description. Overall, there are inconsistencies in the answer content, detail, and technical justification. More improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation of the software inventory performance on the personal (or colleagues) computer, identification of applications, and recommendation for the patches task indicates few important gaps with the task description. Overall, there are a few inconsistencies in the answer content detail, and technical justification. Minor improvement is required. |
• Explanation of the software inventory performance on the personal (or colleagues) computer, identification of applications, and recommendation for the patches task indicates no or very minimal important gaps with the task description. Overall, answer content, detail and technical justification is very well done and consistent with the task. |
Task 3 Computer System Inventory for Processes: Answers provided demonstrates the knowledge and understanding of the computer systeminventory for processes to answer the given task/problem. Marks for this criterion = 25% |
• Explanation of the active processes on the personal (or colleague’s) computer, linked applications, and administrative challenges task indicates large gaps with the task description. Overall, there are major inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. Major changes are required to improve the answers. |
• Explanation of the active processes on the personal (or colleague’s) computer, linked applications, and administrative challenges task indicates considerable gaps with the task description. Overall, there are several inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. High improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation of the active processes on the personal (or colleague’s) computer, linked applications, and administrative challenges task indicates some gaps with the task description. Overall, there are inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. More improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation of the active processes on the personal (or colleague’s) computer, linked applications, and administrative challenges task indicates few important gaps withthe task description.Overall, there are a fewin consistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. Minor improvement is required. |
• Explanation of the active processes on the personal (orcolleague’s) computer,linked applications, and administrativechallenges task indicates no or very minimal important gaps with the task description. Overall, answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification is very well done and consistent with the task. |
Task 4 Computer Management and Backups for better Security: Answers provided demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of the computer system management and understanding of co worker management to answer the given task/problem.
Marks for this criterion
= 25%
|
• Explanation convincing a coworker, availability and reliability task indicates large gaps with the task description. Overall,there are severe inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. Major changes are required to improve the answers. |
• Explanation to convince a co-worker, availability and reliability task indicates considerable gaps with the task description. Overall, there are several inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. High improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation to convince a co-worker, availability and reliability task indicates some gaps with the task description. Overall, there are inconsistencies in the answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. More improvement is required in the answers. |
• Explanation to convince a co-worker, availability and reliability task indicates few important gaps with the task description. Overall,there are a fewinconsistencies in theanswer layout, detail, content, and technical justification. Minor improvement is required. |
• Explanation of the convincing a coworker, availability and reliability task indicates no or very minimal important gaps with the task description. . Overall, answer layout, detail, content, and technical justification is very well done and consistent with the task. |
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment |
|
SLO b) |
Explain the structure of modern operating systems, including types, features, and functions. |
SLO c) |
Identify how operating systems facilitate computer system components to work. |