Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
MATH 524, Nonparametric Statistics
First assignment, due Tuesday, September 24, 2024, noon
1. Let X be a random variable with cumulative distribution function F. It was shown in class that if F is continuous, then F(X) is uniformly distributed on the interval (0, 1). Show with an example that this conclusion may not hold if F is discontinuous.
2. Show analytically that if X1 , X2 , X3 form a random sample from a continuous distribution F, then Pr(X1 < X2 < X3 ) = 1/6. Deduce from this the fact that the joint distribution of the associated rank vector (R1 , R2 , R3 ) is uniform.
3. The effectiveness of vitamin C in orange juice and in synthetic ascorbic acid was compared in 18 guinea pigs (divided at random into two groups of 9) in terms of the length of the odontoblasts after six weeks, with the following results:
Orange juice: 9.4 9.6 9.7 10.0 14.5 15.2 16.1 17.6 21.5
Ascorbic acid: 5.2 5.8 6.4 7.0 7.3 10.1 11.2 11.3 11.5
a) Use Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test statistic to test the hypothesis of no difference against the alternative that the orange juice tends to give rise to larger values.
b) Would the conclusion be different if you used the Kolmogorov– Smirnov statistic?
4. Suppose that you have 50 subjects at your disposal. What sample size n should be used for the treatment group in order to maximize
a) the variance of Wilcoxon’s rank sum statistic Ws under H0 ?
b) the total number of possible values for Ws?
5. To test the effectiveness of vitamin B1 in stimulating growth in mush- rooms, this vitamin was applied to 13 mushrooms selected at random from a group of 24, while the remaining 11 did not receive this treat- ment. The weights (in mg) of the mushrooms at the end of the period of observation were as follows (Ber. Schweiz. Botan. Ges., 53, 409–456):
Controls: |
18 |
14.5 |
13.5 |
12.5 |
23 |
24 |
|
Treated: |
27 |
34 |
20.5 |
29.5 |
20 |
28 |
|
Controls: |
21 |
17 |
18.5 |
9.5 |
14 |
|
|
Treated: |
20 |
26.5 |
22 |
24.5 |
34 |
35.5 |
19 |
How significant are these results? Justify your answer with detailed calculations.
6. As we saw in class, asymmetric alternative to the Siegel–Tukey statistic is obtained by assigning score 1 to both the smallest and largest obser- vation, score 2 to both the second smallest and second largest, etc. Let T be the sum of scores of the treatment observations. Find the exact null distribution of this Ansari–Bradley statistic if m = n = 4.
7. Let X1 , . . . ,Xm and Y1 , . . . , Yn be two independent samples from con- tinuous distributions F and G, respectively. Assign score 1 to both the smallest and largest observations in the combined sample, assign score 2 to the second smallest and the second largest, etc. Let An be the sum of the ranks of the observations from the Y-sample. Show that if H0 : F = G holds and n + m is even, then
E(An) = 4/n(n + m + 2), var(An) = 48(n + m − 1)/nm {(n + m)2 − 4}.
Hint: Exploit the fact that a linear transform of An is related to Wilcoxon’s rank-sum statistic with ties.
8. In a study involving 2m subjects, m are assigned to treatment and m to control. Let the control observations be denoted by X and the treatment observations by Y. Suppose that the set of observations turns out to have the pattern XY XY ··· XY , so that the control ranks are 2, 4, . . . , 2m. If large values of Wilcoxon’s rank-sum statistic are significant, use the Gaussian approximation to find the approximate significance probability when m is large.