Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
DDES9904 Models, Systems and Solution Designs | Assessment 1 Brief
Assessment 1 Brief: Scope a Model
DDES9904 | Models, Systems and Solution Design
Assessment Task 1: Scope a Model
WEIGHT 40%
ASSESSMENT TYPE Presentation
GROUP WORK No
DUE DATE Week 5 Sunday 11:59 pm AEST
SUBMISSION
REQUIREMENTS
What to Submit
One voice-over recorded presentation file (MP4 format): 15 minutes and 10 – 15 slides.
Where to Submit
Moodle Submission Portal
Penalties may apply for late submission as indicated in the course outline.
Tutorial will be submitted, not “presented” during a live session.
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate your understanding of modelling paradigms and approaches, the assumptions inherent in these approaches and their fitness for purpose, and how they can be applied to a certain issue. The submission will take the form of a recorded tutorial (PowerPoint) presentation, aimed at an audience with little or no knowledge of modelling. This will encourage you to distill your understanding further so you can communicate complex ideas simply and logically. You will submit the recording, i.e. you will not be required to “present” during a live session. The model scoped in this assignment may also be used as a basis to inform Assignment 2.
You will choose a particular process, problem or need, which may be humanitarian, socially or creatively related or may relate to something you encounter in your daily life. You will then select two different modelling approaches that could fit with your selected process, problem or need. You will then compare and contrast these approaches in the context of your selection, making reference to concepts from lectures and tutorials, and make a final decision on the best modelling approach for your selected process, problem or need, and your reasons for this choice.
You will prepare a voice-over recorded presentation of approximately 15 minutes with 10 - 15 PowerPoint slides, providing the process, problem or need, and the relevant background, assumptions, application areas, limitations and procedures in relation to your modelling choices. An additional slide with your citations and references should be included.
How to Complete this Assessment
1. Identify a process, problem or need and select two modelling paradigms or approaches that could fit with your choice.
2. Consider the assumptions and limitations behind each approach in relation to the specified issue and come to a decision about which approach is better and why.
3. Prepare a tutorial “telling the story’’ of the process, problem or need; your choice of approaches, their comparison, and why you selected one approach over the other as the better fit. Ensure you include the relevant background, assumptions, application areas, limitations and procedures of each of your modelling approaches.
Course Learning Outcomes addressed in this task
1. Conceptualise the use of modelling by examining techniques used in different industries.
2. Present key concepts, assumptions and application areas to an audience of non-technical users.
How you will receive Feedback for this task
Feedback will be provided on a regular basis via your instructor and peers. Summative assessment and feedback will be provided with 14 days of submission.
Assessment 1 Brief: Scope a Model
DDES9904 | Models, Systems and Solution Design
Assessment 1 Criteria: Scope a Model
|
Criteria & Weighting |
Fail (<50) |
Pass (50 – 64) |
Credit (65 – 74) |
Distinction (75 – 84) |
High Distinction (85 – 100) |
|
Understanding of modelling approach 60% |
Limited evidence of understanding of modelling concepts and approaches. Explanation is fragmented and unclear. Justificationsare absent or minimal. Substantial revisions required. |
There is basic evidence of understanding of modelling approaches. Example application is acceptable but could be analysed further. |
There is a good understanding of modelling paradigms. Key concepts are clearly included. Choices and reasons are appropriate. Evaluation is appropriate. |
There is evidence of a substantial engagement with modelling approaches, supported by sound analysis of contextualised limitations and application. A high level of conceptual understanding demonstrated. Evaluation is well thought-out. |
There is evidence of mature engagement with the modeling approaches. Decisions are sophisticated. Evaluation is insightful. |
|
Presentation of tutorial 40% |
Tutorial is incomplete or poorly presented. Overall tutorial is difficult to follow. |
Tutorial follows some structure but could be developed further. Articulation of concepts, choices and reasons is present and can be followed but could be clearer. |
Tutorial is well-structured and explained clearly and simply. Tutorial follows a logical pattern that enhances clarity of ideas but some aspects could be developed a little further. |
Tutorial is well-balanced and well-articulated. Tutorial is engaging and follows a clear, logical structure. Tutorial is appropriately tailored to a beginner audience.
|
Tutorial is thoughtful, well- developed, extremely well-articulated and presented. Tutorial is appropriately tailored to a beginner audience. |