Hello, if you have any need, please feel free to consult us, this is my wechat: wx91due
Module Title: |
Digital Analytics |
Module Code: |
5008MKT |
Assignment Number |
CW1 |
Assignment Title |
Individual Report |
Assignment Weighting |
50% |
Assessment Information
This assignment is designed to assess learning outcomes:
1. Discuss the evolution of digital marketing along with emergence of advanced search engine and click stream mechanism.
2. Apply the search engine optimisation procedure along with effective web design for effective navigation and conversion.
3. Analyse, assess, and evaluate the fundamentals of data capture mechanism, data segmentation and
application of analytics to marketing strategy. This assignment is an individual 2000 word report.
This assignment requires you to complete the following:
1. Discuss the evolving role of the modern website and how digital analytics has changed the way it is being used in the overall digital marketing strategy, using the theories and framework that you have learnt in the curriculum.
2. Use the digital analytics framework, analyse and evaluate the Google Merchandise Store as an organisation. Identify its business goals, marketing objectives and key performance indexes.
3. Using web analysis tools, and applying digital marketing software and theory/theoretical framework, analyse and evaluate Google Merchandise Store’s website (googlemerchandisestore.com)
performance over the last 3 months, highlighting its efficacy in meeting its marketing objectives and organisational goals.
4. Recommend how the Google Merchandise Store can improve their digital strategy for the future, focusing solely on its website strategy.
Suggested Structure
Cover Page
Title of Contents
Introduction
This section should include introduction to the assignment and main concepts being presented. (~200 words)
Literature Review or Review of Key Concepts
This section should describe the concept of digital analytics and its role in marketing and digital marketing strategy development. The development of the role of websites as a modern marketing channel should also be discussed. (~300 words)
Organisational Analysis
This section should include the analysis and evaluation of the organisation. Identify it organisational (business) goals, derive its key marketing objectives and performance indexes as a result of this. (~500 words)
Current Web Strategy Analysis
This section should include the analysis and evaluation of the website. The website should be assessed and evaluated using both qualitative (e.g. content analysis) and quantitative (e.g. number of visits) analysis. Various analysis tools (e.g. Google Analytics, Similar Web) should be used. Marketing theory and/or frameworks should also be used to structure and frame the analysis. (~600 words)
Recommendations
In this section should include the evaluation of the findings through the analysis and draw analytical insights to
derive recommendations for improvement in the future. (~400 words)
References
Appendices (if required)
Note: Use of tables, figures and screenshots is encouraged.
Formatting
• Double or 1½ line spaced
• Font Arial or Times New Roman
• Font size 11 or 12
• Referenced in CU APA edition 7 style
• Include page numbers (excluding title page)
Criteria for Assessment
In order to gain a good pass for this assignment at this level students are expected to pay attention to the following generic grading criteria.
Class |
Mark range |
Guidelines |
Class I |
90 – 100%
80 – 89%
70 – 79% |
In addition to that for 70 – 79% below, an outstanding answer that could hardly be bettered. High degree of understanding, critical/analytic skills and original research. Outstanding in all respects. In addition to that for 70 – 79% below, the answer demonstrate an excellent level of understanding, presence of clear description, critical/analytical skills or research. Answer entirely relevant to the assignment set. Answer demonstrate clear understanding of theories and concepts. There is evidence of wide-ranging reading and/or research beyond the minimum recommended. Answers will be written/presented in a clear, well- structured way with clarity of expression. At level 3, evidence of independent, critical thought would normally be expected. |
Class II : I |
65 – 69%
60 – 64% |
Answer demonstrating a very good understanding of the requirements of the assignment. Answer demonstrate very good understanding of theories, concepts, issues and methodology. Answer is accurate and appropriate. Reading beyond the recommended minimum present. Well organised and clearly written and presented. A very good understanding. Well organised and clearly written and presented. Some reading and research beyond recommended in evidence. |
Class II : II |
55 – 59%
50 – 54% |
Answer demonstrating a good understanding of relevant theories, concepts, and issues. Some reading/research beyond that recommended may be present. Some errors may be present and inclusion of irrelevant material. May not be particularly well-structured, and/or clearly presented. Answer demonstrating a reasonable understanding of theories, concepts, and issues. May be significant amount of irrelevant material. May not be well-structured and expression/presentation may be unclear at times. |
Class III |
45 - 49%
40 – 44% |
An understanding demonstrated, but may be incomplete and with some errors. Limited use of material with limited reading/research on the topic. Poorly structured and not well-expressed/presented. Irrelevant material likely to be present. Basic understanding demonstrated, with some correct description. Answer likely to be incomplete with substantial errors or misunderstandings. Little use of material and limited reading/research on the topic in evidence. Poorly structured and poorly expressed/presented. Some material may be irrelevant to the assignment requirements. |
Marginal fail |
35 – 39% |
Some relevant material will be present. Understanding is poor with little evidence of reading/research on the topic. Fundamental errors and misunderstanding likely to be present. Poor structure and poor expression/presentation. Much material may not be relevant to the assignment. |
Fail |
30 – 34%
20 – 29%
0 – 19% |
Inadequate answer with little relevant material and poor understanding of theories, concepts, and issues. Fundamental errors and misunderstandings present. Material may be largely irrelevant. Poorly structured and poorly expressed/presented. Clear failure to provide answer to the assignment. Little understanding and only a vague knowledge of the area. Serious and fundamental errors and lack of understanding. Virtually no evidence of relevant reading/research. Poorly structured and inadequately expressed/presented. Complete failure, virtually no understanding of requirements of the assignment. Material may be entirely irrelevant. Answer may be extremely short, and in note form only. Answer may be fundamentally wrong, or trivial. Not a serious attempt. |